|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Mon November 19, 2007
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
Well made, strong, good appearance
|
|
Cons:
|
Slightly small for a 'full sized' DSLR
|
|
Mine is 15 years old, the leather has gone a bit stiff but otherwise excellent
|
|
gwhitegeog
Registered: November 2007 Posts: 6
|
|
Review Date: Sat December 22, 2007
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Very well made, stylish, stealthy
|
|
Cons:
|
slightly small for a DSLR
|
|
Another excellent Billingham bag. I agree the leather stiffens after a while (mine is 18 years old!) but other than that, they are very long-lived. The 225 is just a little small for a large camera (e.g. 1V, 1D) but for a smaller system, is ideal. Excellent value for money (in terms of longevity and bangs-for-bucks). Gary (London, UK)
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
|
Review Date: Fri April 4, 2008
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 7
|
|
Pros:
|
Quality and construction
|
|
Cons:
|
Small size, high price for a small bag
|
|
Originally bought this bag for my Olympus OM1 system many years ago. Ideal for the Olympus, could take a couple of bodies and set of lenses. Nowadays little used with digital slrs, simply too small. Also, the higher body size of the digital slr compared to the OM1s means little top protection. Also, back in the days when I first bought the bag it looked nothing like the sort of bag you would put cameras in. Today the Billingham bag image is much better known and is too well recognised as a camera bag. However, could still be just what you are looking for, but bear in mind the size limitation.
|
|
|
Registered: November 2005